Tuesday, September 29, 2026
1567 War of Religion breaks out in France as Huguenots try to kidnap King Charles IX
1835 The Treaty of New Echota was signed between the US government and representatives of a minority Cherokee political faction to cede all lands of the Cherokee east of the Mississippi River to the United States
1890 US 7th Cavalry massacred 200+ captive Sioux at Wounded Knee, South Dakota
1908 A patent was granted for a 4-wheel automobile brake, Clintonville, Wisconsin
1970 Occupational Safety and Health Act was signed by President Richard M. Nixon
2020 First debate between US Presidential candidates Donald Trump and Joe Biden was held, widely criticized as chaotic and ill-tempered
2023 More than 50 people were killed in two suicide attacks in Pakistan, during celebrations for the birth of the Prophet Muhammad
2025 German airline Lufthansa announced they would cut 4,000 administrative positions by 2030 and replace them with artificial intelligence and digitization processes.
In bed at 9:20, up at 4; 0410 204.2 119/67/68 111; 52/70/51, cloudy
Morning meds at 8 a.m. Entresto at 5:15 a.m. and p.m.
The handsome fellow in the photo is a Cooper's Hawk, of which we have many in our neck of the woods. One of them landed on the ground under our bird feeders yesterday, and I suspect that he has been hanging around the neighborhood lately. I neglected to fill the bird feeders last night and filled them this morning. Normally, some of our neighboring birds show up not long after I fill the feeders, but not this morning. A beautiful little chipmunk is in the grass under the feeders, stuffing his cheek pouches with some of the safflower and/or sunflower seeds I spread on the ground whenever I fill the tube and tray feeders. He competes with the mourning doves, which also like to ground-feed, when they aren't 'setting up shop' on or near the tray feeder above. I've read that chipmunk cheeks can grow to 3 times the size of their heads when filled with food, This explains, in large measure, why I don't have to worry about a large accumulation of seeds under our feeders; they are either eaten quickly by the birds or hauled away by the chipmunks. Yesterday I watched what appeared to be a fight between two chipmunks competing for pride of place in the feeding ground. The aggressor appeared to jump on the other before they got involved in the more normal chasing activity. Although Cooper's hawks feed normally on smaller birds, I suspect a chipmunk would be a welcome snack for one, so the little guy I'm watching is running a risk by lling up.
Anti-Ziomism: A Jewish History by Benjamin Moser. I was struck by this passage in Chapter 1, titled The Sensitive Rabbi - Aaron Samuel Tamares, Poland:
For Aaron Samuel Tamares, the rabbi of the tiny shtetl of Milejczyce, the controversy would define his life and his ministry. Located on the edge of the ancient forest of Białowieża, on what is today the Polish side of the border of Belarus and Poland, even tiny Milejczyce, for Tamares, was sometimes too big. Nearly every day, weather permitting, he would head into the forest, where he composed most of his works. These were not, at first, intended to be read. “Whenever he became upset by an impure event that took place in society,” he wrote in a third-person memoir toward the end of his life, “he fled to the forest and poured his heart out before the innocent trees—and, with their help, put pen to paper.” When he began to publish, he adopted a pseudonym, “One of the Sensitive Rabbis.” It was under that name that he became known throughout the Jewish world. (p. 36).
Rabbi Tamares reminds me of myself, at least early on in his writing endeavors: sitting alone and writing, "whenever he became upset by an impure event that took place in society. He fled to the forest; I sit in my Lazy Boy recliner with my laptop. Fish gotta swim, birds gotta fly, writers gotta write.
It is an interesting experience to be reading this book about anti-Zionism and its distinction from and relation to anti-semitism at this time in history, with the State of Israel now held in such low regard throughout the world, and with the Guardian film, NAZA, about Israel's behavior in its war on Gaza attracting so much attention in Israel and the U.S.
Doom and Gloom. Yesterday I wrote of the book The Nerd Reich: "It was the scariest book I think I have ever read, about the takeover of government by wealthy tech elites. That sounds preposterous, but we are partway there already with the election of Donald Trump . . ." Today I watched and read the interview of Bill Gates by Ezra Klein in this morning's NYTimes. It was the scariest interview I have ever seen. Gates said that AI is “by far” the most dangerous technology ever created and that the transition into the AI era could be one of the most turbulent periods in human history. That view is consistent with comments he has made in the past few days in other forums.
What seems to worry him most is not primarily a science-fiction scenario in which AI spontaneously becomes evil. His emphasis is more immediate and concrete: AI can greatly amplify the capabilities of malicious human beings. He pointed to risks such as catastrophic cyberattacks, bioterrorism, attacks on critical infrastructure, and potentially mass casualties on a scale that previously would have required the resources of a nation-state. Recent reporting on his remarks says he has warned that misuse could conceivably lead to a billion casualties or more. Others speak of a real risk of annihilation of the human species.
Gates also believes the danger is compounded by the fact that AI can increasingly replace or exceed human cognition in important tasks, while advancing faster than governments and institutions are adapting. In his own recent writing, Gates says that AI is the first technology capable of replacing and surpassing human cognitive abilities in this way, and that even under favorable circumstances the transition will be exceptionally turbulent.
He was emphatic about governance. He rejected the idea that the AI industry can safely police itself; the episode description characterizes him as calling self-regulation “insane.” He wants government, law enforcement, academia, and international institutions involved in monitoring dangerous uses and setting enforceable safeguards.
I had Gates' comments in mind as I watched the CNN coverage of Donald Trump's meeting with an abundance of AI and Big Tech executives this afternoon. (In his role of Lord of Language and Names, Trump has changed the term for Artificial Intelligence to Super Intelligence.) Trump continues to assert that no government oversight of AI development is necessary or desirable. He believes in self-regulation, which means no regulation. He turns for support to the CEO of Nvidia, Jensen Huang, who, to me, appears to be in a distinct minority among tech leaders in minimizing the risks of AI. Elon Musk was in the back row of the big gaggle of Trump and the execs outside the White House while Trump was questioned by the feckless White House press corps. Geri and I both noted his disbelieving facial expressions as Trump announced his rosy assessment about the non-risks of AI.
I still wonder whether we have already passed the tipping point on AI. As Donald Rumsfeld ominously reminded us, “There are known knowns, things we know that we know; and there are known unknowns, things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns, things we do not know we don't know.” Even the AI developers, the experts, don't know what they don't know about what's going on, or has gone on, inside their creations.
We are in deep shit. Our children and grandchildren, the world's children and grandchildren, are in deeper shit.



















