Tuesday, August 4, 2026
1919 Rodin Museum opened in Paris
1925 US Marines left Nicaragua after a 13-year occupation
2016 Sarah Catherine Clausen married Christian Kovacs in Geretsried, Germany
2025 At least 74 Palestinians were killed by Israeli gunfire and airstrikes, including ten seeking aid, and another five Palestinians died of starvation. (Reuters)
In bed at 9:30,up at 5:10; 0525 202.8 120/73/67 122; 68/83/64, sunny
Morning meds at a.m., Eliquis at 6:20 a.m. and 1:15 p.m.
I started Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee yesterday after finishing Everything Happens For A Reason. The book consists of story after story about White men screwing Indians, something I had some knowledge of from general reading over a lifetime. I had hoped the book would have more of a narrative sweep to it, but it appears to be chapter after chapter of variations on the same theme, i.e., how, driven by greed for land or gold or power, Americans from European backgrounds stole land and all its resources from, as it is put in the Declaration of Independence, "merciless Indian savages." It is hard reading, not because of difficulties with the author's style, diction, or syntax, but of the repeated wrongdoings it (probably) pretty accurately portrays. I suspect most of us today have some sensitivity to the idea of White Privilege in America and White Racism, so reading about how it was exercised by our predecessors and our government to destroy or at least dominate racial minorities, especially the red men and Blacks who got in the way of White mastery, is painful. I stopped reading A few years ago, I stopped reading Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents by Isabel Wilkerson because it has the same challenge as Bury My Heart, story after story of racial injustice perpetrated by Whites in the pursuit of wealth and social and political and economic dominance. Both books are valuable compendiums of evidence of America's racial sins and crimes, valuable as research resources, and well worth reading, but in bits and snatches rather than cover to cover, which is just emotionally exhausting. They remind us always of why Adolph Hitler looked principally to American history for inspiration on how to build a society dominated by a Master Race. The early chapters of Bury My Heart, addressing the rounding up and incarcerating the Navahos at Bosque Redondo in eastern New Mexico and the war of Chief Little Crow in Minnesota, remind me of Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. A settler class (White Americans) wants the land on which another people (Native Americans or Indians) have lived for generations, forces them onto other lands, and the other people fight back, resist dispossession, and fight back against occupation. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Hitler had America as a model for dealing with Untermenschen, so did the early Zionists and later settlers in territories occupied in 1967, but it all goes back to Thucydides's wisdom as he wrote about the Peloponnesian Wars: The strong do what they can; the weak suffer what they must. And homo hominis lupus.
After writing the above, I decided to move on, temporarily, from Bury My Heart to John Steinbeck's East of Eden, which I have never read. There, in the introductory pages, I found this:
The history [of the Salinas Valley] was like that of the rest of the state.. First there were Indians, an inferior breed without energy, inventiveness, or culture, a people that lived on grubs and grasshoppers and shellfish, too lazy to hunt or fish. They ate what they could pick up and planted nothing. They pounded bitter acorns for flour. Even their warfare was a weary pantomime.
and
When people first came to the West, particularly from the owned and fought-over farmlets of Europe, and saw so much land to be had for the signing of a paper and the building of a founda- tion, an itching land-greed seemed to come over them. They wanted more and more land — good land if-possible but land anyway. Perhaps they had filaments of memory of feudal Europwhere great families became and remamed great because they, owned things. The early settlers took up land they didn’t need and couldn’t use; they took up worthless land just to own it. And all proportions changed. A man who might have been well-to-do on ten acres in Europe was rat-poor on two thousand in California. , .
Illuminating lines.
There's an article in the current edition of the online Atlantic Magazine titled "The Catholic Church's New Schism," by Paul Parales. It's about the recent excommunication of all members of the Society of Saint Pius X, a//k/a SSPX. SSPX is a group of Catholics who broadly reject the teachings of the ecumenical church council that met between 1962 and 1965 and is generally known as "Vatican II." These dissidents are mostly known for their rejection of the new Mass liturgy, especially the use of vernacular language rather than the traditional Latin, the priest facing the congregation rather than the altar, and the call-and-response interaction between the priest and the congregation. Their disagreements with much broader and deeper, however, including the Council's teaching that salvation is possible outside the Church 😱, and the promotion of religious freedom, and interfaith dialogue and collaboration. The SSPXers believe extra ecclesiam nulla salus, no salvation outside the Church, and that all other religions are false religions and the creation of the Devil. These guys take me back to my childhood and youth in Chicago's Irish Catholic Church in the 1940s and 1950, though really they would like to go all the way back to the world in the days before the Protestant Revolution, to the days of the Papal States. From my memoir, the chapter titled "Raised in the Bosom of the Church":
As volatile as things could be at home, there was no visible volatility in the Holy, Roman, Catholic, and Apostolic Church, especially the Irish American version that ruled in Chicago and in St. Leo Parish. The Church taught us that it was infallible, immutable, incorruptible and, in its view, specially commissioned by God Himself to lead us little children to Jesus.
In English feudalism after the Norman Conquest, all land was considered ultimately owned by the King. The king distributed the land to vassals who promised always to render him loyalty, often to pay him money and other things of value, and usually to provide troops to him for his wars. The top vassals, barons and earls, subdivided their tenures to subvassals who made similar promises of loyalty, rents, military service, or other ‘incidents of tenure’ in return for protection of their tenures by their immediate overlord. From the king to the barons though layers of ‘subinfeudation’ down to the lowest freeholder there existed a system of reciprocal rights and duties between lords and vassals.
This kind of system is still in play in the Catholic Church. The Pope has the role of King or more aptly Emperor, the ultimate owner of the Church’s dominions and principalities (in trust for God, of course.) He has his imperial court or curia. He divides the imperium into geographical and jurisdictional dioceses (much as the Late Roman Empire was divided into dioceses) in which the usual vassal is the local ‘ordinary’ or bishop, who owes fealty, obedience and a share of his revenues from the diocesan holdings to the Pope in return for the Pope’s loyalty and protection (witness the Pope’s cushy treatment of Bernard Cardinal Law after his resignation in disgrace from the Boston archdiocese.) The diocese in turn is subdivided geographically and jurisdictionally into parishes controlled by pastors who owe fealty, obedience and a share of the revenues from their parochial holding to the bishop in return for the bishop’s loyalty and protection (witness, as but one example, the bishops’ disgraceful protection of criminal priests in America, Ireland, Austria, and elsewhere.) It is all very feudal, based on personal power and loyalty relationships between lords and vassals. It is not mere tradition that causes the bishops to kneel before the Pope and kiss his ring or that calls for new priests and deacons to lie prostrate before their bishop during the Litany of Saints in the ordination liturgy in which they vow obedience to him, or that has the Pope addressed as “Your Holiness.” cardinals as “Your Eminence,” archbishops as “Your Grace,” and bishops as “My Lord.” These practices and many more have their roots in the imperial courts of the Roman Empire and in European feudalism. The Church’s feudal power structure was very much in force in the Chicago in which the Clausen children grew up. Our parish priests were accountable to our pastor, our pastor was accountable only to the archbishop who was accountable only to the Vatican.
How the Church operated internally, e.g., how it handled its finances and its personnel, was kept secret from the “laity,” a term whose only meaning is negative: those who are not priests. How much money did the parishes provide to the archdiocese? How much did the archdiocese provide to Rome? How were bishops selected? How were pastors and curates selected? How were priests with alcohol or worse problems handled? These were not matters for the ‘laity,’ but rather for ‘the Church,’ i.e., the priestly caste. The Church was the clergy; the role of the laity was to pray, pay and obey. As Pope Pius X wrote in his 1906 encyclical Vehementer Nos:
It follows that the church is by essence an unequal society, that is, a society comprising two categories of persons, the pastors and the flock, those who occupy a rank in the different degrees of the hierarchy and the multitude of the faithful. So distinct are these categories that with the pastoral body only rests the necessary right and authority for promoting the end of the society and directing all its members toward that end; the one duty of the multitude is to allow themselves to be led, and, like a docile flock, to follow the pastors.
I mentioned earlier that the Church was the greatest influence on Kitty and me other than our family. It would be hard to overstate the centrality of the Church in our lives in the post-war, pre-Vatican II era. Mondays through Fridays we were in the care of the Sisters of Providence, with prayers and religion classes every day of the school week. Every piece of school paper we turned in had “JMJ” (Jesus, Mary and Joseph) and a “+” on the top of the page. Friday afternoons during Lent and Advent were for Stations of the Cross and Benediction. Saturday was Confession day. Sunday of course was Mass. Baptisms, First Holy Communions, Confirmations, marriages and funerals were all occasions for churchgoing and family gatherings. There were four ‘daily masses’ Monday through Saturday mornings, 6:30, 7:15, 8:00, and 8:45, and those of us of the male persuasion (girls weren’t allowed and still aren’t in many parish venues) who were able to learn the Latin (Ad Deum mumble mumble . . .) served as altar boys at these masses for three years, 6th, 7th and 8th grades. On weeknights there were various “Devotions” during the year: benedictions, novenas, 40 hours adoration, stations of the cross and so on. There were weekend retreats for men and separate ones for women. Women who had given birth were “churched” after weekday morning masses. Marian devotions were huge: devotions to Our Lady of Fatima and to Our Lady of Lourdes and to Our Lady of Perpetual Help, devotions relating to the Miraculous Medal, the May Crowning of the main statue of Our Lady, and of course rosary beads were prayed by everyone. During Lent and Advent we fasted and abstained as directed by the Church. Throughout the year, we abstained from meat on Fridays, forming fish fry and macaroni and cheese habits that for many of my generation have lasted a lifetime. On top of all the liturgies and devotions, there were also many social groups organized around the parish: the Holy Name Society for men only, Altar and Rosary Society for women only, the Happy Death Society, the Men’s Sodality, the Women’s Sodality, St. Vincent de Paul Society and so on. Finally, there were parish bowling leagues, basketball and softball leagues, the Catholic Youth Organization boxing and other sports tournaments and weekly bingo games.Dayenu. As if the liturgies and devotionals and social organizations were not enough to set us apart and to ensure the centrality of the Church in our lives, there was also the shunning of people and things beyond the control of the Church. Going to a wedding or a funeral in a non-Catholic church or synagogue was forbidden. (Attending a regular worship service of course was unthinkable, tantamount to apostasy.) Attending public schools rather than Catholic schools was forbidden if there was a Catholic school available and in Chicago there was always a Catholic school available (if you weren’t African-American.) Socializing with non-Catholics was discouraged. Marrying ‘outside the Faith’ was strongly discouraged, with both the Catholic and the non-Catholic who failed to convert made to jump through hoops to ensure that any children would be baptized and raised Catholic. Dating non-Catholics? An occasion of sin. There were plenty of good Catholic girls at Mercy High School and Mother MacCauley taught by the Sisters of Mercy, at Visitation taught by the Sinsinawa Dominicans, and at the many other Catholic girls’ schools. We met the Catholic girls through common Catholic friends, or because we went to Catholic elementary school together, or at Catholic socials, like the weekly chaperoned ‘sock hops’ at St. Sabina parish just west of St. Leo parish. When we met another Catholic, we identified ourselves by parish, not by neighborhood. It was no accident that my first three girlfriends, Shirley Jankowski, Maureen Boyle, and Charlene Wegge (rhymes with “Peggy,”) were all Catholic. We shared a common culture: Chicago Catholic.With almost a million and a half Catholics living in Chicago, organized into largely self-contained parishes under the control of the Cardinal Archbishop, it was pretty easy for Catholic children to grow up in a very Catholic environment, not quite sociologically and psychologically ghettoized, but approaching it. I didn’t have a good friend who was not Catholic until I was 16 or 17 years old when I became friends with Dave Sinclair, a Protestant who lived down the block from us. We both worked as stockboys at a food and liquor store on the corner of 74th and Halsted owned by Wally Halperin, the first Jew I ever met. The store was kitty-corner from ‘the Greeks,’ where my mother started her waitressing career. Dave Sinclair was an altogether good guy who attended our neighborhood public high school, Calumet. I saw no reason why he shouldn’t be eligible for Heaven notwithstanding his non-membership in the One True Religion and Church. Wally, on the other hand, though very good to Dave and to me, clearly wasn’t saved because he stashed ‘girlie magazines’ in the stockroom at the back of the store, which of course Dave and I peeked at. More mortal sins for me, but no effect for Dave since he wasn’t Heaven-bound to begin with.Until my exposure to Wally and Dave at the liquor store, my world was thoroughly Catholic: Catholic church, Catholic elementary school, Catholic high school, Catholic friends, Catholic (in a manner of speaking) family members. The ‘best’ hospitals were the Catholic hospitals, like Little Company of Mary. The ‘best’ old age homes were the Catholic old age homes, like the Little Sisters of the Poor. The only movies we could attend were those that passed muster with the Catholic Legion of Decency, whose movie ratings were published every week in the archdiocese’s Catholic newspaper, The New World. When television arrived on the scene, the programs, unlike post-war movies, were family-oriented and non-threatening (Kukla, Fran and Ollie, Howdie Doodie, I Remember Mama, etc.), but on Tuesday nights we all watched Bishop Fulton J. Sheen’s network program Life is Worth Living, even though it ran opposite The Milton Berle Show. Sheen was an auxiliary bishop in the archdiocese of New York, under the powerful Cardinal Spellman. It speaks to the size and influence of the American Church in the 1950’s that the first national televangelist was a foppish Catholic hierarch and not a Jimmy Swaggert or Pat Robertson or even Billy Graham.I have scratched the surface of some of the besetting sins of the Church I knew as a child and a youth: clericalism, legalism, authoritarianism, sexism coupled with a morbid sexual obsessiveness, racism, secrecy and superstition. It was an institution marked by pride and arrogance and an addiction to power and control. St. Paul admonished the Colossian Christian community “as God’s chosen ones, holy and beloved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, meekness, and patience.” These virtues were for the sheep, Pius X’s ‘docile flock,’ not for the shepherds. The besetting sins of the Church existed long before the mid-20th century and well beyond the archdiocese of Chicago. Some of them pre-dated but became fixed by the first Ecumenical Council of Nicaea in 325 and they were still around at and after the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s.
And so it was.









