Friday, August 7, 2026
1957 Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
1964 US Congress approved the Gulf of Tonkin resolution.
2025 Attorney General Pam Bondi announced a $50 million reward for information leading to the arrest of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro, saying his capture and extradition to the United States was vital for national security.
In bed at 9:15, up at 5:15; 0530 202.2 115/72/63 123; 66/83/66 sunny.
Morning meds at 7:30 a.m. Eliquis at 6 a.m. and p.m.; Trulicity injection at a.m.
Some thoughts while reading East of Eden. (1). I was struck by this passage in chapter 9:
Every once in a while a story would start about how young girls were stolen and enslaved by the controllers of the [whorehouse] industry, and perhaps many of the stories were true. But the great majority of whores drifted into their profession through laziness and stupidity. In the houses they had no responsibility. They were fed and clothed and taken care of until they were too old, and then they were kicked out.
That's a mighty simplistic and negative view of women in the sex trade. Is it true that the great majority of them are lazy and stupid? That they are in the business of prostitution only because it's an easy way of avoiding personal responsibility? I very much doubt that. It ignores factors like poverty and lack of economic opportunity, childhood abuse, neglect, or trafficking, addiction, coercion by partners or organized crime, and limited education or employment options. The novel was published in 1952. I suspect, and hope, that the statement did not reflect Steinbeck's personal view but rather that of the story's narrator.
(2) There are quite a few interesting characters in the novel, but the one I'm most fascinated with right now, i.e., less than 1/3rd of the way through the novel, is Cathy Ames Trask. I described her in an earlier comment as 'a psychopath,' and perhaps she was, but I now suspect that description was too dismissive of her. In any event, I'm struck by Steinbeck's not very flattering portrayal of women, at least in the first half of the book, where the women (except for Cathy) are all secondary characters and none is particularly heroic, unless it's the narrator's mother, Olive Hamilton, or his grandmother Liza Hamilton. Again, other than Cathy, it's a book about men among me: the weak Adam and Charles Trask and the heroic Samuel Hamilton, the narrator's maternal grandfather.
(3) The story of East of Eden is built upon and around the enigmatic story of Cain and Abel in the book of Genesis:
Adam made love to his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, “With the help of the Lord I have brought forth a man.” 2 Later she gave birth to his brother Abel.
Now Abel kept flocks, and Cain worked the soil. In the course of time Cain brought some of the fruits of the soil as an offering to the Lord. And Abel also brought an offering—fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock. The Lord looked with favor on Abel and his offering, but on Cain and his offering he did not look with favor. So Cain was very angry, and his face was downcast.
Then the Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? 7 If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it.”
Now Cain said to his brother Abel, “Let’s go out to the field.” While they were in the field, Cain attacked his brother Abel and killed him.
Then the Lord said to Cain, “Where is your brother Abel?”
“I don’t know,” he replied. “Am I my brother’s keeper?”
The Lord said, “What have you done? Listen! Your brother’s blood cries out to me from the ground. Now you are under a curse and driven from the ground, which opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for you. You will be a restless wanderer on the earth.”
Cain said to the Lord, “My punishment is more than I can bear. Today you are driving me from the land, and I will be hidden from your presence; I will be a restless wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me.”
But the Lord said to him, “Not so; anyone who kills Cain will suffer vengeance seven times over.” Then the Lord put a mark on Cain so that no one who found him would kill him. So Cain went out from the Lord’s presence and lived in the land of Nod, east of Eden.
What a curious story! What does it suggest about God? About human nature? About life outside of the Garden of Eden/Heaven? Why did God favor Abel's offering and ignore Cain's? Does God play favorites? Wasn't God responsible, at least in part, for provoking Cain? He knew Cain was vulnerable: "sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it." Is enmity and violence built into human relationships? Why does God protect Cain with 'the sign'? What was 'the sign'? Does it tell us anything about justice in our East of Eden world? About capital punishment? Is this tale, following the tale of the Fall and the expulsion from the Garden, the origin of our idea of "free will" - 'sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it'? What was meant by "Cain went out from the Lord's presence"? Subsequent passages tell us that Cain built cities after his his move east of Eden. Is this a suggestion that great achievements are accomplished by sinners and criminals, not by pious shepherds like Abel?
In the Catholic tradition, Abel is treated as a precursory figure of Jesus Christ (innocent, offering a sacrifice acceptable to God) and Cain as Everyman, prone to sin but, with Grace, able to resist it, i.e., having free will. Pope John Paul II gave the Cain story renewed prominence in his 1995 encyclical Evangelium Vitae ("The Gospel of Life"). He saw Cain's question—"Am I my brother's keeper?" —as echoing throughout modern society whenever people deny responsibility for the vulnerable, the poor, the unborn, the elderly, or victims of violence. For John Paul II, God's implicit answer is: Yes. Every person is his brother's keeper. Jesus taught the same in his parable of The Good Samaritan.
Steinbeck addresses the questions raised by the Cain and Abel fable in chapter 22 of East of Eden, but of course his characters can't answer or resolve them any better than we can.
Worthy of note in this morning's Wall Street Journal:
(1) Putin’s War and Kirill’s Blasphemy: The head of Russia’s Orthodox Church betrays his faith to support the state. By George Weigel
As Russian missiles and drones continue their assault on Ukrainian civilians, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill of Moscow, has just published “War: Beyond the Visible Causes and Consequences,” doubling down on his campaign to justify in religious terms Russia’s war of extermination against Ukraine.
Issued by the official publishing house of the Moscow patriarchate, the book casts Vladimir Putin’s war as a salvific action: a duty to God and a Russian service to a corrupt world. Patriarch Kirill lurched into heresy when he promised Russian soldiers immediate entrance into heaven, their sins forgiven, if they die in Mr. Putin’s “holy war.” Now Patriarch Kirill asserts the “great responsibility” of the Russian people is to win the war because “our earthly vocation is to be warriors of the Lord, to resist evil.” God has determined the war’s outcome, he writes, “and victory belongs to those who stand on the side of the light.”
In the first decades of Soviet communism, Russian Orthodoxy gave a great witness of martyrdom, even as its exiled thinkers enriched Christian theology and fostered ecumenical dialogue. But since 1943—when Stalin, trying to strengthen patriotic resistance to the Nazi war machine, relegitimized the Orthodox Church—the church’s leadership has been under the Kremlin’s thumb. Its leaders, including the current patriarch, have had strong connections to Moscow’s security services. Perhaps as a result, all of them have had a special loathing for Ukrainian national consciousness. The Moscow patriarchate worked hand in glove with Soviet spymasters to orchestrate a spurious Ukrainian church council in 1946, which legally abolished the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, a custodian of Ukrainian culture and identity.
Cardinal Spellman, archbishop of the Military Vicarate during the Vietnam War, said very similar things to us American troops during that war.
(2) Socialism Is Here—and It’s Serious: As religion recedes, politics takes its place. As confidence fades, political movements grow radical. By Peggy Noonan
Socialism is not a passing thing but an arriving thing. It must be taken seriously as a factor in our politics and the Democratic Party. A CNN/SSRS poll issued this week reported 34% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning adults identify as “democratic socialists.” That number won’t be depressed by the success of Abdul El-Sayed, who won the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate in Michigan on Tuesday by racking up huge margins in progressive enclaves and university towns.
Socialism’s opponents imagine there is safety in its poor track record, which is obvious to everyone. No it isn’t. Many of its proponents wouldn’t know the history and many wouldn’t care: Our version will be better.
Here is some of what that version involves, from an interview two weeks ago by Shannon Bream of “Fox News Sunday” with Megan Romer, national co-chairman of the Democratic Socialists of America. Normally socialists are evasive or euphemistic regarding their policy goals. Ms. Romer wasn’t.
Bream: “Just give me sort of a true or false on these. Abolish the Senate?”
Romer: “True.”
Bream: “Replace the presidency and Supreme Court as we now know them?”
Romer: “Yep.”
Bream: “Abolish ICE?”
Romer: “Absolutely.”
Bream: “Abolish borders and give amnesty to anyone currently in the United States illegally?”
Romer: “As a long-term plan, yep.”
Bream: “Defund the Pentagon?”
Romer: “Absolutely.”
Bream: “Abolish prisons, at least in large part?”
Romer: “Yeah—again as part of a long-term program, yeah.”
Bream: “Government or public ownership of most large corporations?”
Romer: “Yeah, absolutely.”
I joined the DSA years ago because it supported single-payer medicine, i.e., its opposition to our health system run, in large measure, by private insurance companies. It's inconceivable to me how some form of government-paid health care can succeed throughout the industrialized, advanced world everywhere but in the United States. None of the systems is perfect of course, but I fully suspect that every one of them, for all its flaws, is better than the system we have in our own country. My daughter has lived with, and used, the German system for the last 15 years, and wouldn't dream of trading it for what we live with in this country. That said, I dropped my DSA membership some years ago when the group got really radical and grossly unrealistic, as it is now. Our problem is that Republicans and right-wingers conflate any government-sponsored, government-financed, or government-managed social program with Socialism and Socialism = Communism. They have long targeted the Veterans Administration Health Care System since it is government-sponsored, -financed, and -managed. It surely has problems, but the vast majority of us veterans are happy with it and grateful for it, to the endless consternation of its right-wing critics.
A more mundane mystery than the story of Cain and Abel. I walked into the kitchen at about 6 o'clock this morning and saw the loaf of sourdough bread that Geri bought yesterday on the floor next to the refrigerator. I left it there for Geri to see when she got up later and asked her if she had put it there, knowing of course that she wouldn't do that. She said she put it in our breadbox last night and it must have fallen out somehow. But it's not below the breadbox. How did it get to where it was? In the photo, the breadbox is on the third shelf, above the microwave oven. Did that loaf of bread walk from under the breadbox to next to the refrigerator? Did this soft loaf of bread bounce over there? Roll over there? Is it really likely Geri would have placed the loaf in the breadbox in so haphazard a way that it could fall out????
We voted today. We dropped off our absentee ballets at the Village Hall this morning. I voted for Milwaukee's County Executive Crowley and Geri voted for some other candidate (but not DSA member Franscesca Hong), neither of us thinking the Dems have a chance at holding the governor's office in November.






