Saturday, July 25, 2026
306 Constantine I was proclaimed Roman Emperor by his troops
1941 FDR banned selling benzine/gasoline to Japan
1968 Pope Paul VI published the encyclical "Humanae vitae (Of Human Life)" which rejected any artificial forms of birth control
2019 US Justice Department resumed the use of the death penalty, scheduling five executions
In bed at 9, up at 5:35; 0555 0555 132/74/59 XXX 204.0, 0606 115/71/60, 0616 110/70/60; 64/79/59, cloudy
Morning meds at 9 a.m.
I finished A Confederacy of Dunces this afternoon. Actually, I was listening to the last chapter and dozed off during a good portion of it, but didn't bother to go back and start again. Basically, his mother finally gave up on Ignatius and was taking steps to have him involuntarily committed to a mental health facility when his former girlfriend Myrna Minkoff showed up from New York City, deus ex machina, and rescued him and his abundance of Big Chief notebooks containing the deranged fragments of his magnum opus, and spirited him away from New Orleans. I was glad to be done with it, not because it was all terrible, but it became terrible at some indefinite point when it became boring. There's only so much of Ignatius J. Reilly that an ordinary reader can take, and the book contains too much of his rantings, his deprecations, his unending hyperboles both in belittling others and in promoting himself. I came to realize as I read and listened to the narrative that Ignatius reminded me of Donald Trump, his hyperbolic name-calling of his ubiquitous enemies and hyperbolic and narcissistic self-promotion.
Geri gets home today after her 6-day visit with her dear buddy Kate Donovan. I'll be glad to have her home, but I wish I were in better shape for her return. I was in a bit of a funk when she left and am the same way today, disspirited, emotionally listless. I watched Jack Nicholson in About Schmidt last night, and the sad sack that he played in that film reminded me of myself. His character retired at age 66 after serving 40 years as an actuary for an insurance company and discovered that he was an empty shell. He had no hobbies, no friends, no reading habits, and a distant relationship with his only child, his daughter. He was emotionally alone and lonely, pathetic. I'm not nearly as bad off as Schmidt is in the movie, but I can't say I'm enjoying life, either. My birth family's all gone, as are most of my good friends, the guys I used to work with, golf with, and fish with. I've got Geri, thank God, and Sarah and Andy, but Sarah lives in Europe and Andy's busy with three very active kids, a wife, and a new job, all making demands on him. Thinking of him makes me think of the singer in "The Cat's in the Cradle." I'm throwing a pity party for myself while realizing that doing so only worsens the condition. Pathetic. . . . Geri got home around 3:30 and my spirits were lifted within minutes. I'm so fortunate to have her in my life. Indeed she is my life.
An anniversary note re Humanae Vitae, from my memoir:
The Catholic Church also revealed its feet of clay during 1968. Cardinal Spellman was spouting his murderous nonsense about ‘a war for civilization’ without restraint by the Vatican and Catholics were generally as resistant as any other group to much of the civil rights demands. The big difference maker in terms of authority however had nothing to do with war and peace or civil rights, but with sex, Paul VI’s encyclical banning contraception, including birth control pills. In 1963, John XXIII had established a commission to study population and birth control issues. Paul VI appointed 15 cardinals and bishops and 64 lay experts to the commission. The commission provided a report in 1966 saying contraception was not intrinsically evil. The vote among the clergy was 9 to 6; the lay commission vote was 60 to 4. One of the dissenters was Karol Wojtyla, later John Paul II. The dissenters feared that a change in the Church’s position would call into question the pope’s teaching authority.¹ The report was leaked to the press in 1967, and there was a very favorable reaction among modern Catholics, who expected the pope to adopt the commission’s recommendation. Instead, Paul VI rejected the recommendation and adopted the dissenting position, undoubtedly fearing that any change in the Church’s position would weaken the claim to papal authority. What happened, of course, was precisely what Paul and the Vatican conservatives wanted to avoid: widespread rejection of the Church’s teaching authority, especially by American and Western European Catholics. The pope and his conservative curial apparatchiks were seen as, at best. mired in medievalism, and, at worst, more concerned about the power of its shepherds than in the welfare of the flock.
From my point of view, the United States’ position on the war in Vietnam and the Church’s position on contraception flowed from the same source. Johnson and his advisors and Paul VI and his advisors were more concerned with institutional credibility than with the lives of their “subjects.” Not losing face, nationally and personally, was more important to Johnson than the lives of the Americans and Vietnamese who were suffering in the war. Better that thousands should die or be horribly wounded than that the United States be seen for what it inevitably was in Vietnam, an arrogant and feckless loser.
¹“If it should be declared that contraception is not evil in itself, then we should have to concede frankly that the Holy Spirit had been on the side of the Protestant churches in 1930 (when the encyclical Casti Connubi was promulgated) and in 1951 (Pius XII’s address delivered before the Society of Hematologists in the year the pope died).
“It should likewise have to be admitted that for a half a century the Spirit failed to protect Pius XI, Pius XII, and a large part of the Catholic hierarchy from a very serious error. This would mean that the leaders of the Church, acting with extreme imprudence, had condemned thousands of innocent human acts, forbidding, under pain of eternal damnation, a practice which would now be sanctioned. The fact can neither be denied nor ignored that these same acts would now he declared licit on the grounds of principles cited by the Protestants, which popes and bishops have either condemned or at least not approved” [Emphasis added by me.]
Reading these words today, 20 years or so after I wrote them, puts me in mind of Reinhold Niebuhr's Moral Man and Immoral Society, in which he argues, persuasively, that we are much more likely to sin, to act selfishly, as members of a group than we are as individuals. His theory explains our tendency to "circle the wagons" whenever group integrity, identity, cohesiveness, safety, standing, or privilege is attacked.










