Monday, August 10, 2026
70 Second Temple in Jerusalem was set on fire by the Roman army under Titus during the capture of the city (approx)
1993 Ruth Bader Ginsburg was sworn in as a US Supreme Court Justice
2022 Donald Trump invoked the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination repeatedly during a deposition into his organization's business by the NY attorney's office
2025 We received 11inches of rain yesterday and overnight; power outage, basement flooded
2025 Seven people were killed, including five Al Jazeera journalists and prominent Palestinian journalist Anas Al-Sharif, in an Israeli strike near the Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City.
2025 Donald Trump announced that he would meet Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska for talks on August 15 to discuss ending the war in Ukraine.
2025 We received 11inches of rain yesterday and overnight; power outage, our basement flooded
In bed at 9, awake at 4:10, up at 4:30; 0450 113/70/62 124 2 203.2; 68/81/67; mostly partly cloudy day, 0.7 inches of rain in the last 24 hrs., 0.05 inches expected in the next 24 hours.
Morning meds at 9:45 a.m. Eliquis at 6 a.m. and p.m.
I finished East of Eden last night and was disappointed in the concluding chapters. The novel is a celebration of his family history on his mother's side, the Hamilton family descended from its patriarch, Samuel Hamilton, the one hero in the book (unless we consider Lee a hero). More broadly, however, Steinbeck intended the book to be a study of good and evil, or, more precisely, of free will versus determinism. He used Caleb /Cal Trask to represent free will, and Cathy/Kate Ames to represent determinism. Cal recognizes the wicked tendencies in him, his jealousy, vengefulness, and capacity for cruelty and worries that he has inherited these traits from Cathy, his father or uncle Charles, and from Cain. He's like the cartoon character Popeye the Sailor: "I yam what I yam what I yam and I yam what I yam and that's all that I yam 'cause I yam what I yam." In his initial confrontation with his mother, Cathy reinforces the notion that he is her son, carries within himself her wickedness, and can't escape it. Steinbeck, through Cal, rejects this view, at least the inescapability aspect. He believes, like Solszenitsen, that every human being has some good and some evil within him. He doesn't deny the strong influence of genetics, heredity, upbringing, hormones, circumstances, etc., in human decision-making, but he argues that we all ultimately must make choices about what we will do with who and what we are. When Cal recognizes this, Cathy loses her ability to manipulate and control him, which contributes in part to her decision to commit suicide. He disagrees with Robert Sapolsky, who argues pretty persuasively in favor of determinism and against free will. Some of his quotes from his tome Determined:
Thus, essentially every aspect of your childhood—good, bad, or in between—factors over which you had no control, sculpted the adult brain you have.
“The first few years of life are massively determinative of who you become.”
“Determinism doesn’t make life meaningless; it makes meaning something we create.”
There’s our nation with its cult of meritocracy that judges your worth by your IQ and your number of degrees. A nation that spews bilge about equal economic potential while, as of 2021, the top 1 percent has 32 percent of the wealth, and the bottom half less than 3 percent, where you can find an advice column headlined “It’s Not Your Fault if You Are Born Poor, but It’s Your Fault if You Die Poor,” which goes on to say that if that was your lamentable outcome, “I’ll say you’re a wasted sperm.”
[W]e are nothing more or less than the cumulative biological and environmental luck, over which we had no control, that has brought us to any moment.”
In order to prove there’s free will, you have to show that some behavior just happened out of thin air in the sense of considering all these biological precursors. It may be possible to sidestep that with some subtle philosophical arguments, but you can’t with anything known to science.
What the science in this book ultimately teaches is that there is no meaning. There’s no answer to “Why?” beyond “This happened because of what came just before, which happened because of what came just before that.” There is nothing but an empty, indifferent universe in which, occasionally, atoms come together temporarily to form things we each call Me.
Steinbeck and his creation Cal Trask disagree with Sapolsky's conclusion. So does society as a whole and most of us. We believe we make choices and that when we do, we are free to choose otherwise. We have consciences and a belief in right and wrong. When we do something we consider wrong, we call it a sin, and society may call it a crime, or at least a tort. Our legal system, especially our criminal justice system, is based on the belief in free will. Determinism undermines all that.
Robert Sapolsky is probably the most prominent opponent of what he calls "the myth" of free will, but he stands at the top of a long line of those sho have questioned its reality. Arthur Schopenhauer famously put the determinist intuition into a wonderfully compact sentence:
"A man can do what he wills, but he cannot will what he wills."
Friedrich Nietzsche was also deeply hostile to the traditional notion of free will, particularly the idea that people are "causa sui"—the ultimate cause of themselves. Nietzsche thought the concept of free will had been developed partly to make people morally blameworthy.
Baruch Spinoza was also a determinist, arguing that God and Nature are the same. For Spinoza (1632–1677), everything that happens follows necessarily from the nature of God/Nature (Deus sive Natura, "God or Nature"). There is no realm of events that could have unfolded differently in exactly the same circumstances. His famous proposition is essentially: "In nature there is nothing contingent," and that includes human beings.. He thought that our ordinary feeling that we are free comes from ignorance of the causes that determine us.
And then there's the psychologist B. F. Skinner, who attacked free will from the standpoint of behaviorism. His Beyond Freedom and Dignity (1971) argued that human behavior is shaped by environmental contingencies and that the traditional concept of autonomous human freedom is largely an illusion.
The reason I was disappointed with the way Steinbeck wrapped up East of Eden is that it is so clearly tendentious, if that's the right word. It's clear through much of the novel that his belief, expressed usually through Lee, Adam Trask's Chinese servant, is that men do have free will, that our behavior is not controlled by our background, influenced certainly, but not controlled. He believed, like Solszenitsen, that
The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either - but right through every human heart - and through all human hearts. This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates with the years. And even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained.
The denouement of the novel, starting with Adam's rejection of Cal's gift at the family's Thanksgiving dinner, Cal's jealousy and resentment acted out on Aron by taking him to Cathy/Kate's whorehouse, and Aron's flight and death in World War I, seemed so contrived and predictable as to be almost ham-handed and melodramatic.
East of Eden made me think of Elizabeth Strout's novels, especially The Things We Never Say, and her questioning whether we have, or the degree to which we have, free will. In an interview with Katie Couric, she would not admit to being a determinist, but she readily admitted to believing that we have a lot less really free will than we think we do.
I listened to the concluding chapter of Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee while out for a walk down Wakefield Court this afternoon. It relates the story of the 7th Cavalry's massacre of approximately 250 Lakota Sioux, including women and children, on December 29, 1890, at Wounded Knee Creek in South Dakota.
Thoughts and photos from a year ago today.
An unwelcome reminder: How long can we or either of us live in this house that we have been happy to make our home for the last 14 years? I am next to useless around the house. My contribution to taking care of the house consists of (1) filling and emptying the dishwasher with our eating and cooking utensils, (2) keeping the kitchen counter tidy and clean, (3) doing some grocery shopping, and (4) taking out the trash and recycling, i.e., kitchen chores. I keep my bedroom and bathroom clean, do my own laundry, and make my own bed, my own breakfast, and my own lunch. Everything else, Geri does. If it weren't for Geri living here with me, I'd be either in an assisted living facility or only a step or two away from one in a so-called 'independent living' facility for old folks.. It's a daunting reality. Geri mentioned today, on a short rest from back-breaking cutting of wet rugs, etc., that we should be looking at apartments. I'm sure it was a statement borne of disappointment, frustration, and exhaustion from the flood, but it's only a matter of time. I don't have to remind her that I am next to useless around the house, unable to climb a ladder or get up from the floor, but I do have to remind her that she is 81 years old and from a family with a history of heart disease, i.e., not a person to be lugging soaking-wet carpeting up basement stairs. I don't want to move from here, and I'm sure she doesn't either. It would signal, for me at least, the beginning of the end of independent, autonomous living. Next step, giving up the keys to my car? Or worse yet, some form of institutionalization, Bosky Dell Home for Broken-down old Marins and Law Professors Who Can No Longer Take Care of Themselves or Anyone Else. F word. I hear my dear sister shouting down from On High, SNAP OUT OF IT, BUSTER! Stop feeling sorry for yourself! You're in much better shape than most old guys in terms of family and security. My beloved Mom chimes in with "Enough with Micky the Mope!" All true, but when I snapped the photos of the wet cardboard and wet carpeting this afternoon, I lost my balance just standing there and almost fell down on the driveway. I wondered what I would do if, as would have been likely, I couldn't get up. Geri was inside, taking a well-deserved nap, sound asleep. Would I be able to get help from my MedAlert doohickey around my neck, or from my Apple Watch, or iPhone (did I have it with me?), or would I crawl down to County Line Road and wait for a passing walker, jogger, or driver to give me a hand, as Tom Mara did when a took a header on Wakefield a few years ago? Not a day goes by without a near fall. Am I catastrophizing? I suppose so, but still . . ., it's not a pretty future.
Alas, things have gotten only worse over the year since I wrote the above, including having to be rescued by the EMTs of the North Shore Fire Department when I took a header in March while taking the recycling cart. The good news was that, to my surprise, my Apple Watch detected my tumble and my location and notified the NSFD of my plight. It was my 5th fall and 2nd rescue by the EMTs since we moved in here 15 years ago.
Among the damage from the flooding were canvases, painted and unpainted, that I had resting on the basement floor. I thought many times over the years that I ought to raise them off the floor in case of flooding, showing how smart I was and how dumb I am. I suspect they will all end up being trashed because of the likelihood of mildew/mold.

Soaked cardboard, including two nudes I painted decades ago on canvas board, one with her toes reversed, a matter TSJ pointed out to me when he first saw the painting, a regrettable form of belittling.







