Sunday, November 24, 2024
D+19
1922 Italian parliament gave Benito Mussolini dictatorial powers "for 1 year"
1948 "Bicycle Thieves", Italian film directed by Vittorio De Sica, starring himself and Cesare Zavattini, was released (Honorary Academy Award 1950)
1979 Senate report proved US troops in Vietnam were exposed to the toxic chemical defoliant Agent Orange
2015 Chicago police officer Jason Van Dyke was charged with first-degree murder of 17-year-old African American Laquan McDonald in 2014
2020 My TIA or ocular migraine
2021 Three men were found guilty by a jury of felony murder of black runner Ahmaud Arbery, with Travis McMichael also convicted of malice murder in Brunswick, Georgia [
In bed at 9, awake and up at 3:35. Lilly showed up at 4:15. Long hesitation before leaving the doorway. Pacing for a while when she returned.
Prednisone, day 194, 7.5 mg., day 10. Prednisone at 5 a.m. Soda bread at 6. I have my normal persistent, right-side, mid-back pain and shoulder pain, especially in the right shoulder.
Wehner: The central argument of “The Widening of God’s Mercy” [one of Hay's books] is that God often changes his mind in Scripture. And you and your son Chris cite many examples of that happening in the book. Is it your view that God has gotten wiser and more merciful as history unfolds?
Hays: I wouldn’t put it that way. It would be presumptuous for me or anyone to say God has gotten wiser. I think the way I would put it is that for reasons that I don’t understand, God has chosen to act in ways that gradually, over time, unfold the wideness of mercy. And that over time, God reaches out to embrace more and more folks in the scope of the people that he regards as his own people.
Another exchange:
Wehner: Let me ask you about God on this cluster of issues. Is it your view that in A.D. 30 and before, God did believe homosexuality was sinful and that he’s since changed his mind? And if so, would you say that God was wrong in the views that he held in A.D. 30 and during the time the Hebrew Scriptures were written and that God has since evolved into the correct view. Or do you have another understanding of God on this question?
Hays: Well, I certainly wouldn’t presume to say that I know better than God, that God was wrong. I think I would say that God had reasons for telling the children of Israel in the wilderness to observe a limitation of sexual relations to heterosexual relationships. And it was tied very much, I think, to the command, from the creation story in Genesis, that human beings are charged to be fruitful and multiply and in the perilous circumstances of life in the desert. Maybe God had very good reasons for promulgating such a law. I think it’s wrong to say that we can presume to say that God was simply wrong.
I don’t understand the purposes of God fully, but the way I understand it is filtered in part through the stories in the Book of Acts about how the church is impacted by the experience of seeing that the gentiles are given the gift of the Holy Spirit. And so even though there would have been previously a lot of restrictions in place about the ways in which Jewish people could or couldn’t have table fellowship with gentiles, a new thing was happening.
And Peter and Paul, along with the whole church, finally came to recognize that that was the case. So if my son Chris were in the interview — he’s fond of quoting the passage from Isaiah where the prophet, speaking in the persona of God, says: See, I’m doing a new thing. Do you not perceive it? And that’s the way I understand it. God is doing a new thing. And it’s beyond me to understand why things are different now. But that’s God’s prerogative. It’s not mine to judge one way or the other.
The immutability of God (His quality of not changing) is clearly taught throughout Scripture. For example, in Malachi 3:6 God affirms, "I the Lord do not change." (See also Numbers 23:19; 1 Samuel 15:29; Isaiah 46:9-11; and Ezekiel 24:14.) Also, James 1:17: "Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows." Thomas Aquinas also taught that God is immutable and that the only way to understand this and to square it with His effects in time (like the Incarnation, miracles, answering prayers, etc.) is to accept His existence in Eternity, i.e., his timelessness and pure Actuality, not Potentiality. This is hard stuff for us poor earthlings to grasp and it raises yet again my questioning of how one can believe in the God of the Bible, the God of the Summa and the Catechism, the God of the Evangelicals and Pentecostals. We speak of God as if "He" (masculine singular pronoun) were a "person," indeed 3 "persons. " (1) The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinct Persons, (2) each Person is fully God, (3) there is only one God. Jews and Muslims, the other People of the Book, can't understand this and most of the rest of us can't either. It's another of those 'mysteries' we were taught about in Catholic grade school and high school religion classes and in Catholic university theology classes. All very philosophical and metaphysical and Scholastic and incomprehensible.
Imagine the people who believe such things and who are not ashamed to ignore, totally, all the patient findings of thinking minds through all the centuries since the Bible was written. And it is these ignorant people, the most uneducated, the most unimaginative, the most unthinking among us, who would make themselves the guides and leaders of us all; who would force their feeble and childish beliefs on us; who would invade our schools and libraries and homes. I personally resent it bitterly.
Isaac Asimov
No comments:
Post a Comment