Friday, April 28, 2023
In bed at 10, up at 6:20, 5 or so pss, thinking about estate at death, Andy's and Anh's retirement. 39℉, high of 54℉, cloudy all day, wind NE at 5 mph, gusts up to 13 mph. The sun rose at 5:49, sunset at 7:40, 13+59.
FB Post this morning: Amy Davidson Sorkin has a short piece in the current New Yorker - "What's Going on with Samuel Alito -." in which she asks "How many people and organizations can Justice Samuel Alito accuse of having bad will or dishonest motives in a short dissent—fewer than nine hundred words—to a Supreme Court order granting a stay?" Alito's dissent in the mifepristone case is a short and worthwhile read, worthwhile insofar as it reveals just how cynical Alito is. Clarence Thomas also dissented, but without stating his reasons. What I hope we all remember is that these 2 men, the most reactionary members of the Court, were appointed by Republican 'moderates,' George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush. "“I have followed this man’s career for some time,” said President George H.W. Bush of Clarence Thomas in July 1991. “He is a delightful and warm, intelligent person who has great empathy and a wonderful sense of humor.” George W. Bush sold himself to the American electorate as a "compassionate conservative." "In announcing Alito’s nomination, Bush said: “He’s scholarly, fair-minded and principled, and these qualities will serve him well on the highest court in the land. [His record] reveals a thoughtful judge who considers the legal merits carefully and applies the law in a principled fashion. He has a deep understanding of the proper role of judges in our society. He understands judges are to interpret the laws, not to impose their preferences or priorities on the people.” The Bushes are perfect illustrations of why so-called Republican 'moderates' cannot be trusted with governmental power. First, it is always a fair question to what degree their 'moderateness" masks a deep-seated reactionary conservatism. Second, even 'moderate' Republicans feel the need to satisfy their right-wing colleagues by appointing the likes of Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. The frightening state our country is in today can, in large measure, be laid at the feet of those "moderate Republicans," George H. W. and George W. Bush. More's the pity.
"It’s OK to Be Single, the Church of England Says: So Was Jesus" Where exactly in the New Testatment does it say that Jesus was single, in the sense of unmarried and never married? I've long thought it unlikely that Jesus was simply "a bachelor," as our friend and gay neighbor John McGivern's mother used to refer to him. Jewish men in Galilee 2,000 years ago expected to 'be fruitful and multiply," to augment the population of the Chosen People. Men and women were expected to marry and bear children and there is no reason to think that Jesus was the weirdo in Nazareth who went through his entire late teens and 20s without marrying. That he was apparently unmarried at age 30 or so when he began his 'public life' suggests to me that he was a widower who lost his wife and probably their child in childbirth. Perhaps it was such a devastating loss that led him into the desert for 40 days and 40 nights. Who knows? It is mere speculation, of course, but so is the belief that Jesus had not been married before the start of his public life. My speculation seems at least as likely as the speculation that Jesus was a lifelong bachelor, perhaps a 'gay blade.' Who knows?
In any event, it's nice that the Anglicans have at long last accepted that life is complicated and often hard and that people are varied, some drawn towards coupling up, some towards not coupling up. Some left-handed, some right-handed, some light-skinned, some dark-skinned. Some straight, some gay, some both, some confused. Different strokes for different folks. We need to get used to it, but of course we won't.
No comments:
Post a Comment